{"id":27938,"date":"2022-03-29T15:08:13","date_gmt":"2022-03-29T15:08:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.cancerresearchuk.org\/?p=24151"},"modified":"2024-11-03T15:13:42","modified_gmt":"2024-11-03T15:13:42","slug":"your-questions-on-our-research-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/your-questions-on-our-research-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"Your questions on our research strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Following an incredible response to the launch of our refreshed research strategy last week, we take the opportunity to answer some questions from the research community<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

Last week we launched our refreshed Research Strategy<\/a>. It sets out our scientific priorities and how we will work with you, our world-class research community, to achieve this.<\/p>\n

It puts discovery research and excellence at the heart of what we\u2019ll do. It\u2019s built around 4 objectives \u2013 to discover, detect, prevent, and treat \u2013 so that progress in understanding the fundamental biology of cancer leads to new prevention measures, tests and treatments.<\/p>\n

To achieve this, we will spend \u00a31.5bn over the next five years, investing in creative people and transformational research. We will support research to reduce cancer inequalities and improve outcomes for everyone. And we\u2019ll involve people affected by cancer in our work.<\/p>\n

If you missed the launch broadcast, you can catch up here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We were delighted that the strategy stimulated a vibrant discussion, with many insightful questions from the cancer research community. In fact, so many questions were asked that we didn\u2019t get a chance to address them all. Here, we answer those questions we couldn\u2019t get to during the event.<\/p>\n

Q. Other than inspiring a diverse range of students to study stem subjects, what is CRUK doing to remove barriers to increase ethnic diversity in the workforce?
<\/em><\/strong>We\u2019re developing a range of measures to address the structural issues of equality and equity in cancer research.<\/p>\n

Our 2021 EDI in Research Action Plan called for our institutes to each publish their own action plans, which they\u2019ve done. We\u2019ve set up a cross-CRUK institute EDI working group to share EDI strategy plans, best practice and approaches to joint issues such as increasing the diversity of students and the wider workforce, considering not only ethnicity, but also gender and socio-economic background.<\/p>\n

On the wider question of how we are removing barriers, we will soon be publishing our annual report on progress against the action plan, which shows the progress we\u2019ve made in many areas, including grant applications and awards, diversity in funding reviews as well as areas where we still need to go further.<\/p>\n

In 2022-23 we have specific work planned to offer PhD scholarships to underrepresented groups, to support a Black in Cancer conference, and we\u2019ll continue looking at gender and social mobility by working with In2Science and In2Research and providing mentoring programmes, such as Women of Influence.<\/p>\n

Q. It is great that CRUK strives for inclusivity and to address EDI imbalance. The balance of your grant panels is important to achieve this \u2013 and should include both gender and encompass institutes outside of London. You have said that you\u2019ll be removing independent reviewers\u2019 comments for grants and extensively relying on panels instead to help diversity of people and thought. How exactly will this help?
<\/em><\/strong>Expert review panels don\u2019t represent a shift away from independent peer review \u2013 they\u2019re just a different way of doing it, and we think having in-person discussions is generally a more valuable way of reviewing research applications than asking for written reviews. We considered the move away from written review carefully. We\u2019ve observed that the change to review panels actually helps us to attract a greater diversity of people into our peer review processes \u2013 particularly representation from outside the UK, resulting in a good depth of discussions. The panel members remain independent of CRUK and we closely monitor the make-up of our panels to ensure we are including a diverse range of voices.<\/p>\n

We advertise for members to join our review panels and committees. We select members based on the expertise required on the panel or committee and the diversity of backgrounds we believe is essential to fund the highest quality research. We strongly encourage those with relevant expertise to apply to join our review groups.<\/p>\n

More information on changes to our peer review process<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Q. Will there be any focus on funding researchers outside traditional cancer fields?
<\/em><\/strong>Following our 2014 research strategy, we set up initiatives to attract those not currently working in cancer to bring their expertise and insight to bear on cancer questions \u2013 these included project awards in cancer immunology and multidisciplinary research. The new strategy highlights a growing appreciation of whole-body physiology and opportunities in data science, so we want to continue building new networks and attracting those from other disciplines. We want to look at the range of options to do this, such as continuing to fund through existing schemes, convening researchers to explore collaborative opportunities, and working with a greater range of partners.<\/p>\n

Q. How are you assessing the impact of Grand Challenge grants. For the amount of funding, one would expect the bar is very high on judging it a success. Has the overall grand challenge approach had a significant impact on patient outcomes.
<\/em><\/strong>Cancer Grand Challenges is focused on solving cancer\u2019s toughest challenges. It was co-founded by CRUK, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) and other funding partners, after assessment of the success and proof of principle demonstrated by CRUK\u2019s Grand Challenge initiative, in which we looked at the impact of the scientific outputs.<\/p>\n

As the initiative is challenge led, we will assess the success of Cancer Grand Challenges by measuring the progress made by funded teams against these challenges. There are currently seven multidisciplinary teams across six challenges, which are currently largely discovery and translation in nature. The first four teams (funded in 2017) are already demonstrating key success. For example, the Mutographs team has challenged the classical view that all carcinogens directly cause mutations and suggests that non-mutagenic agents play a greater role in tumour promotion than originally thought.<\/p>\n

Cancer Grand Challenges is overseen by two independent committees, featuring world renowned cancer researchers, clinicians, behavioural scientists and people affected by cancer.<\/p>\n

To look at the wider impact of the Cancer Grand Challenges initiative we will also look at its impact on our future leaders, global advocacy and the tools and collaborations produced as a result.<\/p>\n

Q. CRUK have gone for big funding schemes \u2013 grand challenges and large centre grants \u2013 which places extensive grant funding in the hands of a relatively few number of PIs. Is this the right way to increase diversity of ideas and approaches?
<\/em><\/strong>We will continue to support a large community of researchers at all career stages based on excellence. We have one of the largest national postdoctoral fellowship communities and a widely distributed network of funded researchers supported via many project and programme grants. Our centres\u2019 funding supports many PIs. By funding core facilities, local infrastructure, providing local development funds and studentships individuals can bid for, we believe centres play a key role in generating novel and innovative approaches. It is also key to bringing in individuals with no current CRUK funding and those who don\u2019t currently work in cancer research into the field.<\/p>\n

Cancer Grand Challenges was set up to identify specific barriers which, if removed, would be transformative and unlock the potential for patient benefit by funding a portfolio of novel and innovative research to encourage multidisciplinary approaches and attract new thinking to cancer research. We encourage diverse teams working across a breadth of disciplines, including biomedical sciences, software development and technology, engineering and physical sciences, behavioural, health, population and social sciences.<\/p>\n

So far we\u2019ve funded seven teams, <\/a>featuring 73 research groups and spanning nine countries. Across these teams there are seven principal investigators, 60 co-investigators, over 240 researchers and 35 collaborators. It is a network of nearly 700 investigators convening to solve the biggest cancer challenges.<\/p>\n

Q. Clinical research and access to trials should be at the heart of the NHS. Due to all the service issues, staff shortages and system pressures it feels like this is being forgotten. Less patients are being recruited to studies and hospitals cannot cope. Are CRUK going to look to address this for cancer patients?
<\/em><\/strong>We totally agree that clinical trials for cancer patients should be a standard offering to patients throughout the UK. It is undeniable that clinical research has suffered throughout the pandemic, and even yet is struggling to recover to pre-pandemic levels of activity. Through our policy efforts we continue to lobby the UK government to increase investment in the NHS, to support the UK clinical workforce by providing more dedicated time for research and to take urgent action to accelerate the recovery of the clinical research portfolio.<\/p>\n

Q. Are there any more specific objectives around engaging partners and industry to tackle paediatric\/teenage\/rare cancers where numbers are low and there are inequalities in paediatric access to drugs compared to adults?
<\/em><\/strong>We recognise that it is vital to work with partners to combine expertise, resources, tools, funding, and more for paediatric cancer research, not only to supporting clinical trials and drug development, but also in discovery science and building capacity within the research community. We have engaged with multiple partners in the UK and globally who are very interested in research into cancers that affect children and young people and we are keen to work with other like-minded organisations.<\/p>\n

We already have a strong track record of working in partnership in this area. In 2021 working with Children with Cancer UK, we co-funded the Cancer Research UK\u2013Children with Cancer UK Innovation Awards. This funding is supporting five new teams of world-leading scientists, with up to \u00a31m each, to embark on five very distinct research projects to improve our understanding of the underpinnings of children\u2019s and young people\u2019s cancers.<\/p>\n

Working in collaboration with Stand Up To Cancer, we delivered an international funding call in 2020 to drive multidisciplinary, transatlantic collaboration and knowledge sharing. We funded 3 transatlantic teams for up to $1m.<\/p>\n

Additionally, we also have a long-standing partnership with the devolved UK government health departments to support our ECMC Paediatric Network to deliver early phase clinical trials for children and young people with cancer.<\/p>\n

We are further exploring how to drive industry engagement and develop research partnerships in order to progress science, technologies and treatments for the benefit of paediatric patients and will share new initiatives in due course.<\/p>\n

Thanks to all those who submitted a question during the launch event!<\/p>\n

More on this topic<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Tags<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

There are no tags<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Following an incredible response to the launch of our refreshed research strategy last week, we take the opportunity to answer some questions from the research community Last week we launched our refreshed Research Strategy. It sets out our scientific priorities and how we will work with you, our world-class research community, to achieve this. It […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5137],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-world-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27938"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27938\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44973,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27938\/revisions\/44973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ogkologos.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}